Classification of NOx Emission in Marine Engines Utilizing kNN-Based Machine Learning Algorithms

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 24, 2024
https://doi.org/10.56158/jpte.2024.97.3.02
Download
FULL ARTICLE - PDF
Statistic
Vol. 3 No. 02 (2024): December

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Samet Memiş
Department of Marine Engineering, Maritime Faculty, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma, Balıkesir, Türkiye
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-5872
Ramazan Şener
Department of Marine Engineering, Maritime Faculty, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma, Balıkesir, Türkiye
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6108-8673

Abstract

Marine diesel engines are crucial for powering large vessels in the maritime sector and are known for their efficiency across various industries. However, increasing environmental concerns and stringent regulations targeting air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) have heightened the need for advanced emission control technologies. Addressing this challenge, the study focuses on developing a reliable method to predict NOx emission levels in marine engines, reducing reliance on resource-intensive experimental testing. Leveraging machine learning techniques, particularly k-nearest neighbors (kNN)-based algorithms, the research classifies NOx emissions in marine engines operating under the Reactivity-Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) strategy. Comparative performance analysis reveals that the FPFS-kNN algorithm achieves the highest accuracy (90.00%) alongside strong precision (84.23%), recall (82.37%), and F1 score (82.47%). These findings underscore the potential of machine learning in emission prediction and highlight directions for future exploration in this domain.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Memiş, S., & Şener, R. (2024). Classification of NOx Emission in Marine Engines Utilizing kNN-Based Machine Learning Algorithms. International Journal of Pioneering Technology and Engineering, 3(02), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.56158/jpte.2024.97.3.02

References

  1. Sener, R., Yangaz, M. U., and Gül, M. Z., 2020. Effects of injection strategy and combustion chamber modification on a single-cylinder diesel engine, Fuel, 266, 117122,
  2. Ni, P., Wang, X., and Li, H., 2020. A review on regulations, current status, effects and reduction strategies of emissions for marine diesel engines, Fuel, 279(118477).
  3. Fayyazbakhsh, A., Bell, M. L., Zhu, X., Mei, X., Koutný, M., Hajinajaf, N., et al., 2022. Engine emissions with air pollutants and greenhouse gases and their control technologies, J. Clean. Prod., 376(134260).
  4. Şener, R., and Gül, M. Z., 2021.Optimization of the combustion chamber geometry and injection parameters on a light-duty diesel engine for emission minimization using multi-objective genetic algorithm, Fuel, 304(121379).
  5. Çelik, T., and Şener, R., 2023.Optimization of a biogas fueled reactivity-controlled compression ignition engine using NSGA-II algorithm., J. Eng. Mach.,64(713), pp.670–695.
  6. Gössling, S., Meyer-Habighorst, C., and Humpe, A., 2021. A global review of marine air pollution policies, their scope and effectiveness, Ocean Coast. Manag.,212, pp.105824.
  7. Yüksel, O., Bayraktar, M., and Sokukcu, M., 2023. Comparative study of machine learning techniques to predict fuel consumption of a marine diesel engine, Ocean Eng., 286, pp.115505.
  8. Xin, M., Gan, H., Cong, Y., and Wang, H., 2024. Numerical simulation of methane slip from marine dual-fuel engine based on hydrogen-blended natural gas strategy, Fuel, 358, pp.130132.
  9. Tang, Z., Wang, S., Chai, X., Cao, S., Ouyang, T., and Li, Y., 2022. Auto-encoder-extreme learning machine model for boiler NOx emission concentration prediction, Energy, 256, pp. 124552.
  10. Hoque, K. E., Hossain, T., Haque, A. M., Miah, M. A. K., and Haque, M. A., 2024. NOx emission predictions in gas turbines through integrated data-driven machine learning approaches, J. Energy Resour. Technol.,146(7), pp. 071201.
  11. Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, 8, pp. 338–353.
  12. Molodtsov, D., 1999. Soft set theory-first results, Comput. Math. Appl., 37(4–5), pp. 19–31.
  13. Atanassov, K. T.,1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 20(2), pp. 87–96.
  14. Cuong, B. C., 2014. Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Cybern. 30(4), pp. 409–420.
  15. Memiş, S., 2021. A study on picture fuzzy sets, 7th IFS Contemporary Mathematics and Engineering Conference (IFSCOM’2021), Mersin University Press, Turkey, pp. 125–132.
  16. Mahmood, T., 2020. A novel approach towards bipolar soft sets and their applications, J. Math., 2020(2), pp. 4690808.
  17. Yang, Y., Liang, C., Ji, S., Liu, T., 2015. Adjustable soft discernibility matrix based on picture fuzzy soft sets and its applications in decision making, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 29(4), pp. 1711–1722.
  18. Memiş, S.,2022. Another view on picture fuzzy soft sets and their product operations with soft decision-making, J. New Theory, (38), pp. 1-13.
  19. Memiş, S., 2023. Picture fuzzy soft matrices and application of their distance measures to supervised learning: Picture fuzzy soft k-nearest neighbor (PFS-kNN), Electronics, 12(19), pp. 4129.
  20. Enginoğlu, S. and Çağman, N.,2020. Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices and their application in decision-making, TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math.,10(4), pp. 1105–1115.
  21. Enginoğlu, S. and Arslan, B.,2020. Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their application in decision making, Comput. Appl. Math., 39(325).
  22. Cover, T. M. and Hart, P. E., 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory,13, pp. 21–27.
  23. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., and Erkan, U., 2022. Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft k-nearest neighbor classifier, Neurocomputing, 500, pp. 351–378.
  24. Richards, K. J., Senecal, P. K., and Pomraning, E., 2019. CONVERGE 2.4 Manual, 1078.
  25. Keller, J. M., Gray, M. R. and Givens, J. A., 1985. A fuzzy k-nearest neighbor algorithm, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 15, pp. 580–585.
  26. Dubey, H., and Pudi, V., 2013. Class based weighted k-nearest neighbor over imbalance dataset, 17th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Gold Coast, Australia, pp. 305–316.
  27. Biswas, N., Chakraborty, S., Mullick, S. S., and Das, S., 2018. A parameter independent fuzzy weighted k-nearest neighbor classifier, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 101, pp. 80–87.
  28. Mullick, S. S., Datta, S., and Das, S., 2018. Adaptive learning-based k-nearest neighbor classifiers with resilience to class imbalance, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 29, pp. 5713–5724.
  29. Ramentol, E., Vluymans, S., Verbiest, N., Caballero, Y., Bello, R., Cornelis, C., and Herrera, F., 2015. IFROWANN: Imbalanced fuzzy-rough ordered weighted average nearest neighbor classification, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 23, pp. 1622–1636.
  30. Gou, J., Qiu, W., Yi, Z., Shen, X., Zhan, Y., and Ou, W., 2019. Locality constrained representation-based K-nearest neighbor classification. Knowl.-Based Syst., 167,pp. 38–52.
  31. Gou, J., Ma, H., Ou, W., Zheng, S., Rao, Y., and Yang, H., 2019. A generalized mean distancebased k-nearest neighbor classifier, Expert Syst. Appl., 115, pp. 356–372.
  32. Gou, J., Qiu, W., Yi, Z., Xu, Y., Mao, Q. and Zhan, Y., 2019. A local mean representation-based k-nearest neighbor classifier, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.,10(3), pp. 29.
  33. Kumbure, M. M., Luukka, P., and Collan, M., 2020. A new fuzzy k -nearest neighbor classifier based on the Bonferroni mean, Pattern Recognit. Lett.,140, pp. 172–178.
  34. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., and Erkan, U., 2021.Numerical data classification via distance-based similarity measures of fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices, IEEE Access, 9, pp. 88583–88601.
  35. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., and Erkan, U., 2022. A classification method in machine learning based on soft decision-making via fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices, Soft Computing, 26(3), pp. 1165–1180.
  36. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., and Erkan, U., 2022. A new classification method using soft decision-making based on an aggregation operator of fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices, Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 30(3), pp. 871–890.
  37. Memiş, S., Arslan, B., Aydın, T., Enginoğlu, S., and Camcı, Ç., 2021. A classification method based on hamming pseudo-similarity of intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices, J. New Results Sci., 10(2), pp.59–76.
  38. Memiş, S., Arslan, B., Aydın, T., Enginoğlu, S., and Camcı, Ç., 2023. Distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their applications to data classification in supervised learning, Axioms, 12(5), pp. 463.
  39. Koç, M. A., and Şener, R.,2021. Prediction of emission and performance characteristics of reactivity-controlled compression ignition engine with the intelligent software based on adaptive neural-fuzzy and neural-network. J. Clean. Prod., 318, pp. 128642.
  40. Şener, R., Memiş, S., and Kılıç, A., 2024. Investigation of Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Fueled with Diesel and Natural Gas in Marine Engine using Soft Decision-Making Methods, Global Maritime Congress (GMC’24): ITU Press, pp. 125–130.
  41. Fawcett, T., 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 27, pp. 861–874.
  42. Erkan, U., A., 2021. precise and stable machine learning algorithm: Eigenvalue classification (EigenClass), Neural Comput. Appl., 33, pp. 5381–5392.
  43. Stone, M., 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 36, pp. 111–147.
  44. Tadayoni, B., Amiri, E., and Soorani, F.,2023. Knowledge in medical prescriptions with the help of genetic fuzzy hybrid model. Int. J. Pioneering Technol. Eng., 2(2), pp. 142–146.
  45. Ozer, O., 2022. Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators based on complex picture fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making problems, J. Innov. Res. Math. Comput. Sci., 1(2), pp. 33–54.
  46. Jaleel, A.,2022. WASPAS technique utilized for agricultural robotics system based on Dombi aggregation operators under bipolar complex fuzzy soft information, J. Innov. Res. Math. Comput. Sci., 1(2), pp. 67–95.
  47. Aydın, T., and Enginoğlu, S., 2021. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision-making. J. Ambient Intell. Humanized Comput., 12(2), pp. 1541–1558.
  48. Aydın, T., and Enginoğlu, S., 2022. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their application to performance-based value assignment to noise-removal filters. Comput. Appl. Math., 41(4), pp.192.
  49. Memiş, S.,2023. Picture fuzzy parameterized picture fuzzy soft sets and their application in a performance-based value assignment problem to salt-and-pepper noise removal filters. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 25(7), pp. 2860–2875.