Usability Analysis of Mobile Applications Used for Foreign Language Learning

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fatih Erdoğdu
Kübra Kırdar
Fatma Eski
Edanur Okumuş

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of mobile applications for learning foreign languages. The study examined the effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction of the selected applications. The research was conducted using a user-based approach and observed the behavior of real users while using the applications and collected their opinions. The study participants consisted of 10 university students. The participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. This method allowed researchers to quickly reach existing participants. Participants performed five different tasks using applications they had never used before. Applications included Duolingo, Cake and Memrise. In the efficiency dimension, Cake had the highest success rate (54%), while Duolingo had the lowest success rate (34%). In the efficiency dimension, Duolingo had the fastest task completion time, while Cake took the longest. In terms of user satisfaction, Cake received the highest satisfaction rating. Participants reported that Cake was easier to use due to its simple tasks and user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Duolingo's complex interface and repetitive structure made it difficult for users to use the application long-term. Overall, all applications were rated as moderately user-friendly. The study highlights the importance of user-centered design to increase the effectiveness of mobile language learning applications and provides insights into future research.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Erdoğdu, F., Kırdar, K., Eski, F., & Okumuş, E. (2024). Usability Analysis of Mobile Applications Used for Foreign Language Learning. International Journal of Pioneering Technology and Engineering, 3(02), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.56158/jpte.2024.90.3.02

References

  1. Çevik, K. K. and Koçer, H. E., 2012, Mobile Device Based Application of Word Learning a Foreign Language, Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(2): 60-70.
  2. Farr, F. and Murray, L., The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Routledge Press, 2016.
  3. Üstün, A. B., Simsek, E., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., and Yilmaz, R., 2022. The effects of AR-enhanced English Language Learning Experience on Students’ Attitudes, Self-Efficacy and Motivation, TechTrends, 66(5): 798-809.
  4. Godwin-Jones, R., 2021, Big Data and Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1): 4-19.
  5. Yükselir, C.,2017, A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research About Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) In Foreign Language Teaching. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(3): 302-318.
  6. Kukulska-Hulme, A., 2009, Will Mobile Learning Change Language Learning?, ReCALL, 21(2): 157-165.
  7. Tılıç, G., 2016, Interactive Mobile Applications Which Used in Foreign Language Learning: The Duolingo Example, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5: 34.
  8. Yıldız, G., Yıldırım, A., Akça, B. A., Kök, A., Özer, A., and Karataş, S., 2020, Research trends in mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3): 175-196.
  9. Sözer, B., Özdamar, N., & Pilanci, H., 2020, Examining Usability Studies On E-Learning Environments Prepared for Foreign Language Learning, Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 6(4): 174-207.
  10. Stockwell, G. and Hubbard, P., 2013, Some Emerging Principles for Mobile-Assisted Language Learning, The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 2013: 1-15.
  11. Cakmak, F., 2019, Mobile Learning and Mobile Assisted Language Learning in Focus, Language and Technology, 1(1):30-48.
  12. Şenel, S., Şenel, H. C., and Günaydın, S., 2019, Mobile Learning for Everyone: Investigation of Language Learning Applications According to Universal Design Principles, Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 20(1): 73-92.,
  13. Kamis, T., 2014, Public Websites Directory Project, http://www.kamis.gov.tr , Accessed on April 11, 2024.
  14. Baltacı, A., 2018, A Conceptual Review of Sampling Methods and Sample Size Problems in Qualitative Research. Bitlis Eren University Social Science Journal, 7(1): 231-274.
  15. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann, 1994
  16. Brooke, J., 1996, SUS-A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194): 4-7.
  17. Koçak, A. and Özgür, A. R. U. N., 2006, The Sampling Problem in Content Analysis Studies, Journal of Selcuk Communication, 4(3): 21-28
  18. Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., and Akinkuolie, B., 2023, Gamification in Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Duolingo Literature from Public Release Of 2012 to Early 2020, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3): 517-554.
  19. Bailey, B., 2006, Getting the Complete Picture with Usability Testing. https://digital.gov/topics/usability/, Accessed on July 5, 2017.
  20. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., and Huang, Y. M.2017, Review of Research on Mobile Language Learning in Authentic Environments, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4): 284-303.
  21. Momeni, A., 2022, A Critical Review of Cake: A Mobile English Language Learning Application, Journal of Research in Techno-Based Language Education, 2(2): 80-85.